post

Footer About

Footer Contribute

Footer Get Involved

Footer Links

Mind the Product

Customer

How behavioral economics can improve product strategy

Product Roadmap

Why most product roadmaps fail: Phil Hornby (Product Leadership Coach) – ProductTank Porto

B2B product management

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML)

Building Product Teams

Business Strategy

Data Driven Product Management

Digital Transformation

Diversity and Inclusion

Minimum Viable Product

OKRs

Prioritisation

Product Design

Product Research

Product Development Process

Product Ethics

Product Discovery

Product Leadership

Product Management Career

Product Strategy

Stakeholder Management

🌎 <a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/world-product-day/" style="color:#FFFFFF;text-decoration:underline;">Happy World Product Day!</a> Be sure to celebrate product, yourself, and your peers today! 🎉

Join us at #mtpcon London in 2025 – mark your calendars

Connecting fans to creators at Spotify (Dariusz Dziuk, Product Lead, Spotify)

Why teams often struggle with OKRs: A conversation with Jeff Gothelf

Deep dive: Crafting your product vision and mission

5 ways to invent and simplify as an AI/ML product manager

Product leader based in Los Angeles, California. Founder of Productfolio.com, PMA.LA, and. Author of the book, The Smarter Startup (Pearson).

Neal Cabage

<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5333" src="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/create-value-product-management-300x231.jpg" alt="Create Value in Product Management" width="300" height="231" srcset="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/create-value-product-management-300x231.jpg 300w, https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/create-value-product-management.jpg 788w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />Why is it that some products take off while others fall flat? There are many tactical reasons we can point to such as timing, competition, or product-market fit. Fundamentally though, there is one consistent truth regardless of the reason we may determine: some products create value for the market they’re serving, and some simply do not.
Ask yourself whether your product addresses an unmet need or desire. There are two ways to address this problem – outside-in, or inside-out. Lean process has earned a lot of well-deserved accolades in recent years for its outside-in approach and emphasis on working with customers and stakeholders to understand their logical needs and how best to solve them. It may not be the best tool for breakthrough visionary products however, as Steve Jobs once suggested at when he said “It&#8217;s really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of times, people don&#8217;t know what they want until you show it to them.&#8221; Howard Schultz from Starbucks also eluded to this when he said “If I went to customers and asked them if I should sell a $4 cup of coffee, what would they have told me?”.
When seeking to develop breakthrough visionary products, the opposite approach (inside-out) can provide insights that may not be achieved with in outside-in approach. By looking at where existing demand (and competition) is and strategically forecasting where opportunity should be if you were to extend the value complex of an existing commodity product. This approach is reminiscent of the Value Innovation approach described in Blue Ocean Strategies.
To provide clarity on this latter (inside-out) approach, I created a conceptual model I call the Value Creation Plane. It can be useful for understanding the types of value creation and can be used for analyzing where value is currently being created in a given market and projecting how to extend that value in a meaningful way.
The Value Creation Plane
The <a href="http://smarterstartup.org/framework/value-creation-plane/" target="_blank">Value Creation Plane</a> starts with 2 spectrums that are juxtaposed on a Cartesian Plane. The X axis represents the Business Function spectrum, with Monetization (yield and asset management) at one pole and Innovation (technology, UX, etc) at the other pole. The Y-axis meanwhile represents the Perceived Value spectrum. At one end of the Perceived Value plane is Entertainment (Emotional Value) and Productivity (Logical Need) is at the other pole. When we lay these two spectrums perpendicularly across a flat plane, we end up with four quadrants that represent the four positions a brand could take in creating value. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5193" src="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/vcp.png" alt="Value Creation Plane" width="535" height="480" srcset="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/vcp.png 535w, https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/vcp-300x269.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 535px) 100vw, 535px" /> How is this useful? Consider the scenario where you want to enter an established market but you want to innovate the market by taking it to the next level as Apple or Starbucks did. You’d start by identifying the quadrant where the majority of the competition resides, and then determine how you can transcend to another quadrant, thus providing new value. The Value Creation Plan is a simple planning tool that will make this process easier.
Apple Example
In the case of Apple, they created new value around a boring commodity market for computers that focused entirely on quantifiable metrics of value such as Megabytes and CPU speed. Apple created new value atop this commodity market by taking what had been squarely in the bottom-right quadrant and shifting to the upper-right quadrant by appealing to emotion through design and user experience; something sorely lacking from the computer market until then.
LinkedIn Example
LinkedIn is another intriguing example. Social networks like Facebook already existed and were thriving in the upper-right quadrant, but LinkedIn applied the concept of social networking to something more logical and productive – business networking. As such they leveraged the effectiveness of social networks but in a way that created new and non-substitutable value for those who needed a more logical and practical application. Consequently they thrived even as Facebook dominated and while other social networks collapsed in Facebook’s shadow.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5194" src="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/apple.png" alt="" width="535" height="479" srcset="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/apple.png 535w, https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/apple-300x268.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 535px) 100vw, 535px" />
Starbucks Example
Starbucks meanwhile took the coffee commodity market (bottom-left quadrant) and shifted to the right. They created a premium version of the commodity product and then built an entire value complex around it. If you are looking for a remote office to get some work done, you now have a table, WiFi, and an electric outlet. Or, if you’re looking for a place to socialize on a Friday evening, you can buy a Carmel Macchiato in lieu of going to a bakery for a pastry. And because of all of this additional value, the use case fundamentally shifts from simply needing a cheap/quick coffee infusion, to rather satisfying other use cases of productivity and socializing, and as such, they’re able to capitalize on coffee without being anchored to the commodity at its core (coffee).
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-5198 size-full" src="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/starbucks1.png" alt="" width="534" height="479" srcset="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/starbucks1.png 534w, https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/starbucks1-300x269.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 534px) 100vw, 534px" />
Conclusion
At the end of the day, the only products that matter are those that introduce additional value to their respective market. The best way to ensure you’re generating such value is to focus on addressing an unmet need or desire. If you’re philosophically aligned with this fundamental truth, then you’re already half-way there. As for the rest of it, consider the type of opportunity you want to go after and whether the outside-in or inside-out approach is the best for defining your initial product vision. There may even be opportunities to combine these approaches, though pursuing a breakthrough visionary product will probably require strategizing a bit deeper and developing your prototypes to a more production ready state before engaging customers.
[Tweet &#8220;Just finished reading this post on Creating New Value by @nealcabage:&#8221;]

Creating New Value

Neal Cabage

Read more

Comments