post

Footer About

Footer Contribute

Footer Get Involved

Footer Links

Mind the Product

Guest Post

Creating metrics that matter

A case study: Launching a product process in a project-based company

B2B product management

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML)

Building Product Teams

Business Strategy

Data Driven Product Management

Digital Transformation

Diversity and Inclusion

Minimum Viable Product

OKRs

Prioritisation

Product Design

Product Research

Product Development Process

Product Ethics

Product Discovery

Product Leadership

Product Management Career

Product Strategy

Stakeholder Management

🌎 <a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/world-product-day/" style="color:#FFFFFF;text-decoration:underline;">Happy World Product Day!</a> Be sure to celebrate product, yourself, and your peers today! 🎉

How much are product managers getting paid in 2024?

Leading product ops at Delivery Hero with Koen Dubelaar

Connecting fans to creators at Spotify (Dariusz Dziuk, Product Lead, Spotify)

“You’re not as competent as you think” 5 lessons from Ken Chin on navigating a product career (CPO, Spark Networks)

Everything wrong with the product management job market. And how to fix it

Paul Jackson is the founder of Pivot who advise companies on the transition to an effective Product culture.

Paul Jackson

<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4479" alt="Agency-pitch" src="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Agency-pitch-300x180.jpg" width="300" height="180" srcset="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Agency-pitch-300x180.jpg 300w, https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Agency-pitch.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />As digital transformation continues to disrupt most industries and organisations, it is depressing to see the extension of the &#8216;pitch&#8217; process to the selection of agencies and suppliers for product development. Depressing, because the process inevitably rewards those least likely to ever develop something of any value.
Anyone familiar with Mad Men knows that advertising sells dreams and ambitions; always the experience of owning (or using) the product, never the actual product itself. Using this evaluation method to find partners for product development overlooks the critical distinction between a campaign and a product.
Campaigns are short-lived and designed to communicate a specific message for a marketing department on behalf of a business &#8211; their goals and measures of success are entirely financial.
A product has longevity and is typically the end-result of a long and methodical process of identifying, then addressing, unresolved problems or unmet needs in the marketplace. In other words, they are vehicles for delivering small chunks of value to customers. Digital assets created to support campaigns (even brand campaigns) are not products by this definition &#8211; they are something else entirely.
A process designed to find the best supplier to deliver a campaign is not the right process for finding the most credible supplier of digital products. The voice that advocates identifying customer problems, solving them  and delivering incremental improvements to the overall customer experience will always be drowned out by the voice that claims it will revolutionise your business and make you the next Google/Facebook/WhatsApp/Whatever. The head nods when hearing the first voice but the heart leaps when hearing the second. Especially if marketing is the main sponsor.
Successful digital brands started out solving discrete problems in an effective, focussed manner. When they prove their solution scales, the combination of investment dollars and media hype gives them the platform to exaggerate their achievements onto a global plane.
Facebook is a great example: originally a vehicle for Harvard students to gossip about the opposite sex, it now makes grandiose claims to &#8220;give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected.&#8221; Snapchat addresses teenagers&#8217; desire to sext without getting caught. No doubt in the future it will talk about its mission to encourage global spontaneity and &#8220;carpe diem thinking.&#8221;
Pitching works counter to this trajectory. It rewards those that sell the dream, not the utility.  As a result it seems all but inevitable that the successful candidates will be the ones that promise the most and will deliver the least over the long term.
A smart product strategy focuses on delivering a continuous flow of customer value, measuring the progress methodically along the way. As Ovid once observed: &#8220;Add little to little and you have a big pile.&#8221; How many pitches climax with a pragmatic and informed statement like that?

core/freeform

Building Consumer-Grade Experiences for the Enterprise By Ciara Peter

What Makes a Great Product Manager by Graham Siener

The GIST Framework by Itamar Gilad

Scaling the Product and the Team by Rachael Shah

Decisions, Debt, and Other Dilemmas by Janna Bastow

Hacking Your Product Career by Gibson Biddle

How Medicine and Research Translates to Patients by Shree Patel

The Future of Product Management by Richard Harrison

Data Science and Digital Businesses by Ali Gulez

You Need A Product Strategy by Sam Odio

Why Pitching Won’t Deliver Great Products

ProductTank Hyderabad

ProductTank Hong Kong

ProductTank Montréal

ProductTank Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh

ProductTank Chicago

ProductTank Jacksonville

ProductTank Charlotte

ProductTank Pittsburgh

ProductTank Bangkok

ProductTank Cardiff

ProductTank Exeter

ProductTank Seattle

ProductTank Köln

ProductTank Leeds

ProductTank Raleigh

ProductTank Norwich

ProductTank Manchester

ProductTank Newcastle Upon Tyne

ProductTank München

ProductTank Hamburg

ProductTank Düsseldorf

ProductTank Warsaw

ProductTank Tokyo

Why Pitching Won’t Deliver Great Products

Paul Jackson

Read more

Comments