post

Footer About

Footer Contribute

Footer Get Involved

Footer Links

Mind the Product

Guest Post

Creating metrics that matter

A case study: Launching a product process in a project-based company

B2B product management

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML)

Building Product Teams

Business Strategy

Data Driven Product Management

Digital Transformation

Diversity and Inclusion

Minimum Viable Product

OKRs

Prioritisation

Product Design

Product Research

Product Development Process

Product Ethics

Product Discovery

Product Leadership

Product Management Career

Product Strategy

Stakeholder Management

🌎 <a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/world-product-day/" style="color:#FFFFFF;text-decoration:underline;">Happy World Product Day!</a> Be sure to celebrate product, yourself, and your peers today! 🎉

How much are product managers getting paid in 2024?

Leading product ops at Delivery Hero with Koen Dubelaar

Connecting fans to creators at Spotify (Dariusz Dziuk, Product Lead, Spotify)

“You’re not as competent as you think” 5 lessons from Ken Chin on navigating a product career (CPO, Spark Networks)

Everything wrong with the product management job market. And how to fix it

Co-founder of <a href="http://www.prodpad.com">ProdPad</a> and Mind the Product who run ProductTank, ProductCamp London and Mind the Product conferences in London and San Francisco. Blogs about Product Management at MindTheProduct.com &amp; ProdPad.com. Simon began his career in Space Engineering, where he developed a Fortran realtime program to automate satellite operations. He then traveled around the world before a stint in the Australian Army.

Simon Cast

<a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1703103-photo-of-an-electrical-switch-science-experiment-educational-related.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-3163 alignright" alt="1703103-photo-of-an-electrical-switch--science-experiment--educational-related" src="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1703103-photo-of-an-electrical-switch-science-experiment-educational-related-300x201.jpg" width="300" height="201" srcset="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1703103-photo-of-an-electrical-switch-science-experiment-educational-related-300x201.jpg 300w, https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1703103-photo-of-an-electrical-switch-science-experiment-educational-related-1024x686.jpg 1024w, https://www.mindtheproduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/1703103-photo-of-an-electrical-switch-science-experiment-educational-related.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>Minimally Viable Feature approach (MVF) is creating enough of the feature to test the adoption and usefulness before expending lots of resources on fully building out the feature. In the case of ProdPad, we created the simplest form of the roadmap we could, with just enough functionality to be useful and yet provide users with a good sense of what the roadmap did.
The <a title="Product roadmap software" href="http://www.prodpad.com/2013/01/roadmapping-without-dates/" target="_blank">roadmap design in ProdPad</a> was such a radical departure from traditional roadmaps that we had no idea whether it would a) work and b) be accepted by users. If we spent lots of time building out a roadmap that then tanked, it was time and effort we couldn&#8217;t replace &#8211; a killer in a bootstrapped startup. So we went with the minimally viable feature or MVF approach.
We learnt a lot about the roadmap and this has fed into the recent updates to it &#8211; all for half a day&#8217;s original development.
<h2>Why use the MVF approach?</h2>
MVFs are particularly useful for products that have moved out of the MVP or minimally viable product stage. Once you reach that point, people start thinking in terms of fully realised features as they plan. These fully realised features will often take significant amount of resources and time to develop and deliver.
Using the MVF approach means you can test before you devote resources to further developing the feature. It allows you to learn as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible.
<h2>But will they even use it?</h2>
Even if you have half your users asking for a feature it doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean they will actually use the feature. What people say they will do is often radically different from what they actually do.
MVFs are a great way of continuing learning as quickly and cheaply as possible, even in mature products. Once a feature shows traction, then you need to double down on that feature and build it out to nurture that traction and realise the value the feature brings to the product. I&#8217;ve seen situations where a company didn&#8217;t focus effort on a MVF that had a lot of traction, which meant the company failed to capitalise on that traction to create a more valuable product.
When building a new feature, build as little as possible to prove that the users will actually use it.  Get their feedback on what works and what doesn&#8217;t, and put that to good use in building out your feature into a fully-fledged facet of your product.

core/freeform

Product Management Process

How to F.A.I.L. better in product by Marc Abraham

Fighting product-market drift by Dave Wascha

Building a digital product organisation, brick by brick by Nils Michaelis

Learnings from London: Going from Meh to Awesome by Shiva Rajaraman

The art of product management with Ken Norton

Using principles to make better decisions faster by Martin Eriksson

Rethinking delivery with product operations in the age of product

What’s stopping teams from running experiments by Cameron Savage

Top 7 signs you’re in a bad product system by Scott Williamson

How to bring product thinking to any team by Merissa Silk

The Minimally Viable Feature Approach

ProductTank Hyderabad

ProductTank Hong Kong

ProductTank Montréal

ProductTank Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh

ProductTank Chicago

ProductTank Jacksonville

ProductTank Charlotte

ProductTank Pittsburgh

ProductTank Bangkok

ProductTank Cardiff

ProductTank Exeter

ProductTank Seattle

ProductTank Köln

ProductTank Leeds

ProductTank Raleigh

ProductTank Norwich

ProductTank Manchester

ProductTank Newcastle Upon Tyne

ProductTank München

ProductTank Hamburg

ProductTank Düsseldorf

ProductTank Warsaw

ProductTank Tokyo

The Minimally Viable Feature Approach

Simon Cast

Read more

Comments