post

Footer About

Footer Contribute

Footer Get Involved

Footer Links

Mind the Product

Guest Post

Creating metrics that matter

A case study: Launching a product process in a project-based company

B2B product management

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML)

Building Product Teams

Business Strategy

Data Driven Product Management

Digital Transformation

Diversity and Inclusion

Minimum Viable Product

OKRs

Prioritisation

Product Design

Product Research

Product Development Process

Product Ethics

Product Discovery

Product Leadership

Product Management Career

Product Strategy

Stakeholder Management

🌎 <a href="https://www.mindtheproduct.com/world-product-day/" style="color:#FFFFFF;text-decoration:underline;">Happy World Product Day!</a> Be sure to celebrate product, yourself, and your peers today! 🎉

How much are product managers getting paid in 2024?

Leading product ops at Delivery Hero with Koen Dubelaar

Connecting fans to creators at Spotify (Dariusz Dziuk, Product Lead, Spotify)

“You’re not as competent as you think” 5 lessons from Ken Chin on navigating a product career (CPO, Spark Networks)

Everything wrong with the product management job market. And how to fix it

<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jess-lane-72152a123">Jess</a> loves coming to ProductTank and summarising the videos as an excuse to spend even more of her time exploring product management and product making. She's the first Product Manager and longest standing employee at Hire Space - a start up platform that helps users find inspiring venues for events. Get in touch for product chat or recommendations of the latest, cool event spaces!

Jess Lane

<p><a href="https://twitter.com/nclinton">Nate Clinton</a> works as the Managing Director for Cooper in their San Francisco studio. Before Cooper, Nate has held product and design leadership positions at StarMine, Thomson Reuters, and BuildZoom. As a consultancy Cooper leads initiatives in content creation, business development, and creative leadership. They regularly tackle the challenge of assessing and communicating the value of design to their clients. In this session Nate describes why he thinks previous attempts to measure the ROI of design have failed, and how to make better trade-off decisions between design and other aspects of the product.</p>
<h2>Measuring &#8220;Intangibles&#8221;</h2>
<p>Gauging the return on investment for design is notoriously difficult. Nate argues that there is no convincing experiment that shows what would have happened if you had not invested in design. (Though he&#8217;s opened to suggestions!) But it&#8217;s very easy to see the costs involved. Whether design costs £1k or a few £100k, someone will give you an invoice for it.</p>
<p>For Nate, it&#8217;s a misleading question. It is possible to proceed and succeed without designer. Customer-centric roles can make decisions on what would work best for a user- only without the same type of tools and design discipline. But it&#8217;s important to remember that they are <em>still be making design decisions</em>. Even if a visual design is not explicitly specified for a feature, engineers will end up designing as a byproduct of engineering. The question instead is what is the difference in the ROI of Bad or Ignorant Design vs Good Design.</p>
<h2>Informed v.s. Ignorant Design</h2>
<p>Bad design, states Nate, is pure opportunity cost, customer engagement, adoption. You&#8217;ll see deals that you are losing that you might have won. Investing in bad design increases the chances you&#8217;ll fail. If you invest a little more in a high quality designer and give them more time to understand the brief, you can achieve exponential results. He argues that you could AB test your way to a local maximum, but quality design is a way to leapfrog and get out of that local optimisation and into something new. That said, Nate <em>does</em> add a disclaimer that there is an optimal level of investment and after this point you&#8217;ll see a drop off in results.</p>
<p>Nate, in his talk and the following Q&amp;A, discusses how you communicate the <em>importance</em> of design. It&#8217;s important to maintain a design process that increases predictability, repeatability and visibility. As design becomes more adhoc and unpredictable, it feels more risky for your stakeholders to invest in. He also finds it important to give your designers a voice &#8211; make a space for them in your company and empower your whole team to be design conscious. This talk leaves us with two important questions that we all need to ponder:</p>
<blockquote><p>How do you make decisions about how much to invest in decision? And how do you measure the impact of design?</p></blockquote>

core/freeform

What good product design looks like – Miguel Fernandez (VP of Product Design, Slack)

10x Product X Design: Product and research team collaboration by Jane Austin

Learnings from London: What is it like to hold Google in your hand?

Learnings from London: How to build a billion dollar app

Product Systems: How to manufacture lightning in a bottle by Oji Udezue

Product management meets UX design by Tanmay Goel, Emi Kwon, Simran Kaur

Designing a sustainable future by Leyla Acaroglu

Making Hard Product Decisions for All the Right Reasons

Product Vision 2020

The Importance of Empathy, By Jack Sheppard

What is the ROI of Design? – Nate Clinton (ProductTank San Francisco)

ProductTank Hyderabad

ProductTank Hong Kong

ProductTank Montréal

ProductTank Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh

ProductTank Chicago

ProductTank Jacksonville

ProductTank Charlotte

ProductTank Pittsburgh

ProductTank Bangkok

ProductTank Cardiff

ProductTank Exeter

ProductTank Seattle

ProductTank Köln

ProductTank Leeds

ProductTank Raleigh

ProductTank Norwich

ProductTank Manchester

ProductTank Newcastle Upon Tyne

ProductTank München

ProductTank Hamburg

ProductTank Düsseldorf

ProductTank Warsaw

ProductTank Tokyo